nep-spo New Economics Papers
on Sports and Economics
Issue of 2012‒07‒14
two papers chosen by
Joao Carlos Correia Leitao
University of Beira Interior and Technical University of Lisbon

  1. Cost Incentives in European Football By Feddersen, Arne; Humphreys, Brad; Soebbing, Brian
  2. Winning Losers in the Italian Football League “Auction” for Co-Ownership Resolution By Nicola Dimitri

  1. By: Feddersen, Arne (University of Southern Denmark); Humphreys, Brad (University of Alberta, Department of Economics); Soebbing, Brian (Louisiana State University)
    Abstract: We examine the effects of financial incentives on effort supplied by football clubs in European domestic leagues. Tournament theory predicts that the amount of effort supplied varies with returns to effort. We analyze variation in 31,746 domestic league match outcomes in ten European leagues over eleven seasons, exploiting the actual standings on the league table to generate variables reflecting incentives to provide effort in each match. Results from ordered logit regressions indicate that the effort implied by observed match outcomes support the predictions of tournament theory in this setting; clubs supply more or less effort in response to changes in incentives.
    Keywords: effort supply; football; UEFA Champions League
    JEL: J01 J33 L83
    Date: 2012–07–01
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ris:albaec:2012_013&r=spo
  2. By: Nicola Dimitri (Department of Economics and Statistics, University of Sienna, and Research Fellow, Maastricht School of Management)
    Abstract: In the Italian Football League rights to a player’s performance could be co-owned by two clubs for one year. Co-ownership must then be resolved and if the clubs fail finding an agreement they are asked by the League to participate to an auction, where each of them submits a price offer for the missing half of the rights. The player offering the highest price obtains the missing half of the rights paying that price to the opponent. In the paper we characterize the auction equilibrium structure with both complete and incomplete information. Due to its features, a main finding in such auction is that “losers” can obtain a higher payoff than “winners”, and in this sense be the real winners. Then, by considering the auction as a more general mechanism for co-ownership resolution, we extend the model to any finite number of players and argue how some of the results with two players do not necessarily generalize. In particular, while with two players the equilibrium expected payoffs can never be negative this may not be so with a higher number of players. Finally, also with incomplete information the symmetric bidding equilibrium function with any finite number of players is in the “winning losers” spirit. Indeed, bids range between one’s value and twice of it, and increase with the number of players since it becomes more likely that some opponent will have a higher value.
    Date: 2012–07
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:msm:wpaper:2012/08&r=spo

This nep-spo issue is ©2012 by Joao Carlos Correia Leitao. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.