nep-sog New Economics Papers
on Sociology of Economics
Issue of 2007‒07‒07
three papers chosen by
Jonas Holmström
Swedish School of Economics and Business Administration

  1. Knowledge Flows, Patent Citations and the Impact of Science on Technology By Verspagen, Bart; Nomaler, Onder
  2. A National Systems View of University Development: Towards a Broadened Perspective on the Entrepreneurial University Based on the German and US Experience By Mark Lehrer; Phillip Nell; Lisa Gärber
  3. Accounting: A General Commentary on an Empirical Science By Salvary, Stanley C. W.

  1. By: Verspagen, Bart (Eindhoven University of Technology); Nomaler, Onder (Eindhoven University of Technology)
    Abstract: Technological innovation depends on knowledge developed by scientific research. The num-ber of citations made in patents to the scientific literature has been suggested as an indicator of this process of transfer of knowledge from science to technology. We provide an intersec-toral insight into this indicator, by breaking down patent citations into a sector-to-sector ma-trix of knowledge flows. We then propose a method to analyze this matrix and construct vari-ous indicators of science intensity of sectors, and the pervasiveness of knowledge flows. Our results indicate that the traditional measure of the number of citations to science literature per patent captures important aspects intersectoral knowledge flows, but that other aspects are not captured. In particular, we show that high science intensity implies that sectors are net suppli-ers of knowledge in the economic sector, but that science intensity does not say much about pervasiveness of either knowledge use or knowledge supply by sectors. We argue that these results are related to the specific and specialized nature of knowledge.
    Keywords: Knowledge, Input-Output Analysis, Knowledge Flow Matrices, Science-to-Technology Transfer, Patents
    JEL: D83 C67 O33
    Date: 2007
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:dgr:unumer:2007022&r=sog
  2. By: Mark Lehrer; Phillip Nell; Lisa Gärber
    Abstract: This paper postulates a life cycle model of university entrepreneurialism at the national level. Based on the analysis, this paper identifies two fundamental sources of such entrepreneurialism: 1) the institutional anchoring of the university of a public-private hybrid form in organization and finance; 2) decentralization of the system in such a way as to encourage a high level of competition and differentiation. We hypothesize that when national university systems grow and exhibit signs of demand overload, political pressures for system homogenization increase; system homogenization weakens both sources of entrepreneurialism and leads to decline. The sources of decline are thus unintended consequences of policy choices to cope with the side effects of demand overload within national university systems. Implications for the ascendant Chinese university system are derived.
    Keywords: Entrepreneurial University, German University System, US University System, National Systems of Innovation, Interregional Competition, R&D Reform
    JEL: I23 N30 N32 N33
    Date: 2007–06
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:kie:kieliw:1370&r=sog
  3. By: Salvary, Stanley C. W.
    Abstract: Many researchers have questioned the view of accounting as a science. Some maintain that it is a service activity rather than a science, yet others entertain the view that it is an art or merely a technology. While it is true that accounting provides a service and is a technology (a methodology for recording and reporting), that fact does not prevent accounting from being a science. Based upon the structure and knowledge base of the discipline, this paper presents the case for accounting as an empirical science.
    Keywords: national accounting and organizational accounting; risk-sharing arrangements; management of time and other resources; monetization of the economy; command over goods and services; extrinsic value and intrinsic value; commodity money and paper/nominal money; money in relation to credit; the firm and long range planning; market value versus committed finance; explanation and prediction; expectations and uncertainty.
    JEL: M41
    Date: 2007–06–28
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pra:mprapa:3755&r=sog

This nep-sog issue is ©2007 by Jonas Holmström. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.