|
on Sociology of Economics |
Issue of 2005‒09‒11
two papers chosen by Jonas Holmström Swedish School of Economics and Business Administration |
By: | Philippe Aghion; Mathias Dewatripont; Jeremy C. Stein |
Abstract: | We develop a model that clarifies the respective advantages and disadvantages of academic and private-sector research. Our model assumes full protection of intellectual property rights at all stages of the development process, and hence does not rely on lack of appropriability or spillovers to generate a rationale for academic research. Instead, we focus on control-rights considerations, and argue that the fundamental tradeoff between academia and the private sector is one of creative control versus focus. By serving as a precommitment mechanism that allows scientists to freely pursue their own interests, academia can be indispensable for early-stage research. At the same time, the private sector’s ability to direct scientists towards higher-payoff activities makes it more attractive for later-stage research. |
JEL: | L33 O31 |
Date: | 2005–08 |
URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:11542&r=sog |
By: | Lee Branstetter; Yoshiaki Ogura |
Abstract: | What is driving the remarkable increase over the last decade in the propensity of patents to cite academic science? Does this trend indicate that stronger knowledge spillovers from academia have helped power the surge in innovative activity in the U.S. in the 1990s? This paper seeks to shed light on these questions by using a common empirical framework to assess the relative importance of various alternative hypotheses in explaining the growth in patent citations to science. Our analysis supports the notion that the nature of U.S. inventive activity has changed over the sample period, with an increased emphasis on the use of the knowledge generated by university-based scientists in later years. However, the concentration of patent-to-paper citation activity within what we call the "bio nexus" suggests that much of the contribution of knowledge spillovers from academia may be largely confined to bioscience-related inventions. |
JEL: | O31 O38 |
Date: | 2005–08 |
URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:11561&r=sog |