By: |
Anna Brink (Ministry of Finance, Sweden);
Katarina Nordblom (Göteborg University);
Roger Wahlberg (Göteborg University and IZA) |
Abstract: |
The effects of a recent Swedish child-care fee reform are compared with those
of an alternative reform, increased child benefits. The fee reform implied
considerably decreased fees and was intended to increase both labor supply
among parents and their economic wellbeing. We estimate labor supply effects
using a discrete choice labor supply model, and simulate behavioral responses
to the changes. We find positive, but small, effects on labor supply from
reduced fees, while increased child benefits would make single mothers
decrease their labor supply. On the other hand, increased child benefits would
make income distribution more equal. We make a social welfare comparison and
conclude that for plausible values of inequality aversion, the alternative
reform would have been preferable to the implemented fee reform. |
Keywords: |
labor supply, redistribution, reform, child care, fees, child benefit |
JEL: |
H31 I38 J22 |
Date: |
2007–04 |
URL: |
http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:iza:izadps:dp2748&r=pub |