nep-pbe New Economics Papers
on Public Economics
Issue of 2024‒01‒22
seven papers chosen by
Thomas Andrén, Konjunkturinstitutet


  1. Efficiency and Incidence of Taxation with Free Entry and Love-of-Variety By Kroft Kory; Laliberté Jean-William; Leal Vizcaíno René; Notowidigdo Matthew J.
  2. Nudging for Prompt Tax Penalty Payment: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Indonesia By Eko Arief Yogama; Daniel J. Gray; Matthew D. Rablen
  3. The impact of the global tax reforms on Ireland’s corporate investment and the wider economy By Siedschlag, Iulia; McLoughlin, Robert; Daire De Hora
  4. Monopsony Amplifies Distortions from Progressive Taxes By David W. Berger; Kyle F. Herkenhoff; Simon Mongey; Negin Mousavi
  5. Corporate Control and Exceptions to Minimum Corporate Taxation: A Step Toward Fairness or Financialisation? By Yuri Biondi
  6. Reassessing the Effects of Corporate Income Taxes on Mergers and Acquisitions Using Empirical Advances in the Gravity Literature By Bradley, Sebastien; Carril-Caccia, Federico; Yotov, Yoto
  7. Affirmative Action, Equal Opportunity, or just tax the rich? Development, efficiency, and the pursuit of equity By Gautam Bose; Arghya Ghosh

  1. By: Kroft Kory; Laliberté Jean-William; Leal Vizcaíno René; Notowidigdo Matthew J.
    Abstract: We develop a theory of commodity taxation featuring imperfect competition along with love-of-variety preferences and endogenous firm entry and exit, and we derive new formulas for the efficiency and pass-through of specific and ad valorem taxes. These formulas unify existing canonical ones and feature a new term capturing the effect of variety on consumer surplus. Intuitively, if taxes reduce product varieties in the market, then the impact on social welfare depends on how much consumers value variety. As a proof-of-concept, we use the theoretical formulas to identify love-of-variety preferences in an empirical application. Our welfare analysis shows that the marginal excess burden of taxation is very sensitive to the estimated love-of-variety, which can overturn classical results on the desirability of ad valorem versus specific taxation.
    Keywords: Public economics;Taxation;Tax incidence;Sales tax
    JEL: H20 H22 H71
    Date: 2023–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:bdm:wpaper:2023-20&r=pbe
  2. By: Eko Arief Yogama; Daniel J. Gray; Matthew D. Rablen
    Abstract: We conducted a randomised controlled trial in Indonesia to evaluate the effect of three intervention letters on tax penalty compliance behaviour. Over 10, 000 individual taxpayers are randomly assigned to receive either a deterrence, information, or simplification letter, or no letter. Our results indicate that simplification, which makes paying a penalty less burdensome administratively by providing billing codes to pay the penalties, yields the highest probability of timely settlement, increasing compliance by 32 per cent compared to the control group. Deterrence also positively impacts penalty compliance, increasing timely settlement rates by 27 per cent. The least effective intervention is the information letter. Although associated with a 12 per cent increase in tax compliance, this effect is only statistically significant at the 10 per cent confidence level. Our results suggest that strategic messaging by tax authorities in developing countries can be a cost-effective tool for improving tax penalty payment compliance.
    Keywords: tax penalties, tax compliance, RCT, simplification, deterrence, information, Indonesia
    JEL: C93 D91 H26 Z18
    Date: 2023
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ces:ceswps:_10836&r=pbe
  3. By: Siedschlag, Iulia; McLoughlin, Robert; Daire De Hora
    Date: 2023
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:esr:wpaper:wp761&r=pbe
  4. By: David W. Berger; Kyle F. Herkenhoff; Simon Mongey; Negin Mousavi
    Abstract: In this short paper we show that progressive income taxes distort hiring and wages when firms have labor market power. From a firm’s perspective, raising pre-tax wages increases employment by less when taxes are progressive as less of the pre-tax wage is paid to workers. Understanding this when setting wages leads to lower wages and employment at all firms. When firms differ in productivity, progressive taxes also distort the allocation of labor across firms. We characterize this novel monopsony cost of progressivity in a simple monopsony economy and derive efficiency wedges that depend on progressivity. A simple quantification of these wedges points to the possibility that the monopsony cost may be of similar magnitudes to redistribution and insurance benefits.
    JEL: E0 H0 J0
    Date: 2023–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:31972&r=pbe
  5. By: Yuri Biondi (IRISSO - Institut de Recherche Interdisciplinaire en Sciences Sociales - Université Paris Dauphine-PSL - PSL - Université Paris sciences et lettres - INRAE - Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement)
    Abstract: The European Commission is currently seeking to implement the OECD/G20 agreement on minimum corporate taxation, in view to ensuring a minimum effective tax rate on large multinational corporate groups and protecting the level playing field for business and society. In fact, the proposed ruling introduces scope exceptions for groups directly or indirectly controlled by governmental entities, non-profit organisations, and investment and pension funds. These scope exceptions may provide incentives for controlling parties to restructure the corporate group in view to avoid taxation, if the minimum effective tax threshold is constraining and material. Furthermore, it may provide a tax competitive advantage for groups controlled by those parties.
    Keywords: tax avoidance global wealth chains multinational companies, tax avoidance, global wealth chains, multinational companies
    Date: 2023–12–01
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:journl:hal-03902527&r=pbe
  6. By: Bradley, Sebastien (Drexel University); Carril-Caccia, Federico (University of Granada); Yotov, Yoto (Drexel University)
    Abstract: We study the relationship between corporate income taxes and mergers and acquisitions (M&As). To this end, we compile and deploy a dataset consisting of all cross-border and domestic M&A deals for 118 source (acquirer) and 122 destination (target) countries and 84 sectors over the period 1995-2019. From a methodological perspective, we implement leading methods from the empirical gravity literature on trade, foreign direct investment, and migration, and we demonstrate their importance for estimating the impact of corporate income taxes on cross-border versus domestic M&A activity. Our main finding is that a one percentage point increase in target country corporate income tax rates decreases the number of cross-border acquisitions by about 0.8 percent relative to domestic M&As. This result is robust to various sensitivity checks and is comparable to previously published estimates. Nevertheless, our stepwise estimation strategy exemplifies the importance of individual empirical refinements. These should serve as the basis for future work investigating the effects of taxation on bilateral flows.
    Keywords: Corporate income taxes; Mergers and acquisitions; Gravity method
    JEL: F10 F14 F21 F23 H25 H87
    Date: 2023–12–20
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ris:drxlwp:2023_008&r=pbe
  7. By: Gautam Bose (School of Economics); Arghya Ghosh (UNSW School of Economics)
    Abstract: We examine the efficiency properties of prominent equity policies in a general model of de- velopment that incorporates the Lewis model and the Kremer (O-ring) model as limiting cases. We find that reservation (quotas) is the most effective policy in an economy with low technological complexity. Our intuition is that production in such economies is less sensitive to variations in embodied skills. Training to equalize skills becomes more attractive as complexity increases. However, quotas never lose relevance. Tax-transfers supersede the other measures in highly complex and fiscally mature economies. These findings provide a step towards a more informed and robust policy.
    Date: 2023–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:swe:wpaper:2023-14&r=pbe

This nep-pbe issue is ©2024 by Thomas Andrén. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.