| Abstract: |
Despite considerable focus on clustering as a dimension of segregation and the
explosion of big location data, extant literature has not explicitly examined
residential segregation and the clustering of segregated space as an influence
on mobility. Integrating urban sociological theories and decision science, we
test criteria contributing to individuals’ selection of activity
neighborhoods. Using a range of spatial data sources, we compare Whites and
Blacks’ choice of frequently visited neighborhoods in Chicago, stratified by
whether residing in a contiguous segregated space (CSC). Discrete choice
models show strong evidence for the impact of clustered residential
segregation in individual decision making. All groups are drawn/compelled to
White CSC neighborhoods, largely due to the relative institutional, amenity,
and safety advantages of these areas. The Black CSC boundary functions as an
“invisible wall” to CSC-residing Blacks, limiting their exposure to advantaged
White CSC neighborhoods. Whites exhibit a net avoidance to Black-majority
spaces, CSC and non-CSC alike. Blacks are drawn to racially homophilous Black
neighborhoods, potentially due to social interaction opportunities, spatial
knowledge, and prior habits. Results are robust to alternative specifications
of choice sets and organizational deficits. Implications for understanding
spatial choice in social context and designing de-segregation policies through
behavioral “nudges” are discussed. |