|
on Neuroeconomics |
Issue of 2011‒08‒22
two papers chosen by |
By: | Fehr, Ernst; Hoff, Karla |
Abstract: | Economists have traditionally treated preferences as exogenously given. Preferences are assumed to be influenced by neither beliefs nor the constraints people face. As a consequence, changes in behaviour are explained exclusively in terms of changes in the set of feasible alternatives. Here the authors argue that the opposition to explaining behavioural changes in terms of preference changes is ill-founded, that the psychological properties of preferences render them susceptible to direct social influences, and that the impact of"society"on preferences is likely to have important economic and social consequences. |
Keywords: | Biodiversity,Labor Policies,Economic Theory&Research,Cultural Policy,Gender and Social Development |
Date: | 2011–08–01 |
URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:5760&r=neu |
By: | Da Silva, Sergio; Baldo, Dinora; Matsushita, Raul |
Abstract: | We conducted a questionnaire study with student subjects to look for explicit correlations between selected biological characteristics of the subjects and manifestation of the Allais paradox in the pattern of their choices between sets of two pairs of risky prospects. We found that particular characteristics, such as gender, menstrual cycle, mother’s age at delivery, parenthood, second- to fourth-digit ratio, perceived negative life events, and emotional state, can be related to the paradox. Women,particularly when not menstruating, are less susceptible to the paradox. Those born to not-too-young mothers are also less prone to the paradox. The same holds true for men who have fathered children and had been exposed to high levels of prenatal testosterone, people who had experienced many negative life events, and those who were anxious, excited, aroused, happy, active, or fresh at the time of the experiment. Further, left-handers and atheists may be less inclined to display the paradox. |
Keywords: | Allais paradox; choice under risk; biological characteristics; experimental economics |
JEL: | D81 C91 |
Date: | 2011 |
URL: | http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pra:mprapa:32747&r=neu |