New Economics Papers
on Microfinance
Issue of 2011‒09‒22
four papers chosen by
Aastha Pudasainee and Olivier Dagnelie


  1. Sex and Credit: Is There a Gender Bias in Microfinance? By Beck, T.H.L.; Behr, P.; Madestam, A.
  2. Measuring the Social Performance of Microfinance in Europe By Fabrizio Botti; Marcella Corsi
  3. Surplus et responsabilité sociale en microfinance :Etude de cas d’institutions péruviennes By Eddy Bloy; Joël Ernult; Marek Hudon; Anaïs Périlleux
  4. Financial Deepening, Property Rights and Poverty: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa By Yifei Huang; Raju Jan Singh

  1. By: Beck, T.H.L.; Behr, P.; Madestam, A. (Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research)
    Abstract: This paper examines the effects of group identity in the credit market. Exploiting the quasirandom assignment of first-time borrowers to loan officers of a large Albanian lender, we test for own-gender bias in the loan officer-borrower match. We find that borrowers pay on average 29 basis points higher interest rates when paired with a loan officer of the other sex. The results indicate the presence of a taste-based rather than a statistical bias, as borrowers’ likelihood of going into arrears is independent of loan officer gender. Ending up with an opposite-sex loan officer also affects demand for credit, with borrowers being 11.5 percent less likely to return for a second loan. The bias is more pronounced when the social distance, as proxied by difference in age between the loan officer and the borrower, increases and when financial market competition declines. This is consistent with theories that predict a tastebased bias to be stronger when the psychological costs of being biased are lower and the discretion in setting interest rates is higher. Taken together, the findings suggest that owngender preferences can have substantial welfare effects.
    Keywords: Identity;interest rates;gender;loan officers;microfinance.
    JEL: G21 G32 J16
    Date: 2011
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:dgr:kubcen:2011101&r=mfd
  2. By: Fabrizio Botti; Marcella Corsi
    Abstract: Microfinance promise to serve low-income or disadvantaged beneficiaries excluded from the formal banking sector in a financially sustainable way (thus to achieve the so called “double bottom line” of financial and social performance) built excitement around the development of a global industry. However, for a long time an anti-subsidy position embedded in the international key donor community have shown little concern of social performance data and information on beneficiaries profiles in terms of various dimension of social and financial exclusion. Until recently, most of the emphasis of microfinance advocates has been devoted to MFIs financial performance following the “win-win” proposition, according to which financial viability should be sufficient to show social impact, a view that is supported by a controversial evidence and is based on a selective understanding of conceptual facts. Nevertheless, several initiatives recently translated into the Social Performance Task Force (SPTF) attempt to explore social aspects of microfinance providing a new definition of social performance more focused on the whole process leading to a social impact. Aim of this paper is to measure European MFIs social performance according to a core set of common indicators developed by the SPTF but using data collected in 2010 by the European Microfinance Network (EMN) on a sample of 170 microfinance actors operating in 21 countries out of 27 European Union (EU) member countries, current EU candidate countries and countries belonging to the European Free Trade Area (EFTA). The reference framework followed in the current social performance analysis examines the whole process of translating MFIs mission into social impact and includes the analysis of three connected dimensions of the social performance process corresponding to different set of indicators: the intent of the MFI, the effectiveness of the internal system and activities in achieving its targets, MFI outputs and eventually its capacity to positively affect clients life and achieve social goals.
    Date: 2011–09
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:sol:wpaper:2013/97213&r=mfd
  3. By: Eddy Bloy; Joël Ernult; Marek Hudon; Anaïs Périlleux
    Abstract: This paper analyses the distribution of the productivity surplus of three microfinance institutions, with different statuses, in Peru. The results show that the NGO favors its clients and its self-financing margin, which could help it to grow more rapidly and to keep some reserves. The cooperative prefers to give higher returns on its savings.
    Keywords: microfinance; governance; surplus; Peru; cooperatives
    JEL: O16 O50 G21
    Date: 2011–09
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:sol:wpaper:2013/97123&r=mfd
  4. By: Yifei Huang; Raju Jan Singh
    Abstract: Recent studies on the relationship between financial development and poverty have been inconclusive. Some claim that, by allowing more entrepreneurs to obtain financing, financial development improves the allocation of capital, which has a particularly large impact on the poor. Others argue that it is primarily the rich and politically connected who benefit from improvements in the financial system. This paper looks at a sample of 37 countries in sub-Saharan Africa from 1992 through 2006. Its results suggest that financial deepening could narrow income inequality and reduce poverty, and that stronger property rights reinforce these effects. Interest rate and lending liberalization alone could, however, be detrimental to the poor if not accompanied by institutional reforms, in particular stronger property rights and wider access to creditor information.
    Keywords: Access to capital markets , Cross country analysis , Development , Household credit , Income distribution , Poverty reduction , Private sector , Sub-Saharan Africa ,
    Date: 2011–08–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:imf:imfwpa:11/196&r=mfd

This issue is ©2011 by Aastha Pudasainee and Olivier Dagnelie. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.