nep-ino New Economics Papers
on Innovation
Issue of 2013‒12‒15
23 papers chosen by
Steffen Lippert
University of Otago, Dunedin

  1. Growth through heterogeneous innovations By Akcigit, Ufuk; Kerr, William R.
  2. The Impact of Cooperation on R&D, Innovation and Productivity: an Analysis of Spanish Manufacturing and Services Firms By Fernández Gual, Verónica; Segarra Blasco, Agustí, 1958-
  3. Spillover Use and Innovation Success: What Role Does R&D Play? By Uwe Jirjahn
  4. Innovation and Trade Policy Coordination: the Role of Firm Heterogeneity By Antonio Navas; Davide Sala
  5. The Role of Product Innovation Output on Export Behavior of Firms By Tavassoli, Sam
  6. Stimulating Innovation in ASEAN Institutional Support, R&D Activity and Intellectual Property Rights By Rajah RASIAH
  7. Who drives smart growth? The contribution of small and young firms to inventions in sustainable technologies By Birgit Aschhoff; Georg Licht; Paula Schliessler
  8. Measuring Firm-Level Productivity Convergence in the UK: The Role of Taxation and R&D Investment By Ioannis Bournakis; Sushanta Mallick; David Kernohan; Dimitris A.Tsouknidis
  9. Financial Dependence and Innovation: The Case of Public versus Private Firms By Viral V. Acharya; Zhaoxia Xu
  10. Education and Human Capital Development to Strengthen R&D Capacity in the ASEAN By Tereso S. TULLAO, Jr.; Christopher James CABUAY
  11. Who Disseminates Technology to Whom, How, and Why: Evidence from Buyer-Seller Business Networks By Tomohiro MACHIKITA; Yasushi UEKI
  12. Knowledge flows percolation model – a new model for the relation between knowledge and innovation By Popescul, Daniela
  13. Can non-market regulations spur innovations in environmental technologies? : A study on firm level patenting By Marit E. Klemetsen; Brita Bye; Arvid Raknerud
  14. Do Inventors Talk to Strangers? On Proximity and Collaborative Knowledge Creation By Crescenzi, Riccardo; Nathan, Max; Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés
  15. Innovation and Regulation in the Telecommunications Industry By M. Bourreau; P. Dogan
  16. Employment and innovation: Firm level evidence from Argentina By Ramiro De Elejalde; David Giuliodori; Rodolfo Stucchi
  17. Modularity and Product Innovation in Digital Markets By M. Bourreau; P. Dogan; M. Manant
  18. Cooperation in Product Development and Process R&D Between Competitors By M. Bourreau; P. Dogan
  19. Innovating without Information Constraints: Organizations, Communities, and Innovation When Information Costs Approach Zero By Elizabeth J. Altman; Frank Nagle; Michael L. Tushman
  20. The allocation of entrepreneurial effort and its implications on economic growth By Muñoz, Félix; Encinar, María Isabel; Otamendi, Francisco Javier
  21. Intangible Knowledge Capital and Innovation in China By Fleisher, Belton M.; McGuire, William H.; Smith, Adam Nicholas; Zhou, Mi
  22. A Vibrant European Labor Market with Full Employment By Ritzen, Jo; Zimmermann, Klaus F.
  23. Governance mode vs. governance fit? Performance implications of make-or-ally choices for product innovation in the worldwide aircraft industry, 1942-2000 (Online first). By Castaner, X.; Dussauge, P.; Garrette, B.; Mulotte, L.

  1. By: Akcigit, Ufuk (University of Pennsylvania and NBER); Kerr, William R. (Harvard University and NBER)
    Abstract: We study how exploration versus exploitation innovations impact economic growth through a tractable endogenous growth framework that contains multiple innovation sizes, multi-product firms, and entry/exit. Firms invest in exploration R&D to acquire new product lines and exploitation R&D to improve their existing product lines. We model and show empirically that exploration R&D does not scale as strongly with firm size as exploitation R&D. The resulting framework conforms to many regularities regarding innovation and growth differences across the firm size distribution. We also incorporate patent citations into our theoretical framework. The framework generates a simple test using patent citations that indicates that entrants and small firms have relatively higher growth spillover effects.
    Keywords: endogenous growth; innovation; exploration; exploitation; research and development; patents; citations; scientists; entrepreneurs
    JEL: L16 O31 O33 O41
    Date: 2013–11–22
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hhs:bofrdp:2013_028&r=ino
  2. By: Fernández Gual, Verónica; Segarra Blasco, Agustí, 1958-
    Abstract: This paper investigates relationships between cooperation, R&D, innovation and productivity in Spanish firms. It uses a large sample of firm-level micro-data and applies an extended structural model that aims to explain the effects of cooperation on R&D investment, of R&D investment on output innovation, and of innovation on firms’ productivity levels. It also analyses the determinants of R&D cooperation. Firms’ technology level is taken into account in order to analyse the differences between high-tech and low-tech firms, both in the industrial and service sectors. The database used was the Technological Innovation Panel (PITEC) for the period 2004-2010. Empirical results show that firms which cooperate in innovative activities are more likely to invest in R&D in subsequent years. As expected, R&D investment has a positive impact on the probability of generating an innovation, in terms of both product and process, for manufacturing firms. Finally, innovation output has a positive impact on firms’ productivity, being greater in process innovations. Keywords: innovation sources; productivity; R&D Cooperation
    Keywords: Tecnologia -- Innovacions, Indústria -- Productivitat, Investigació industrial, 338 - Situació econòmica. Política econòmica. Gestió, control i planificació de l'economia. Producció. Serveis. Turisme. Preus,
    Date: 2013
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:urv:wpaper:2072/220761&r=ino
  3. By: Uwe Jirjahn
    Abstract: Based on data from Germany, this study finds a positive link between using knowledge spillovers from rivals and innovation success in establishments without R&D but not in establishments with R&D. This supports the hypothesis that rivals’ knowledge is more valuable to establishments that are below the frontier of technology and product development.
    Keywords: Corporate Spillover asymmetry, R&D, Learning, Product innovation
    JEL: L60 O31 O32
    Date: 2012
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:trr:wpaper:201204&r=ino
  4. By: Antonio Navas (Department of Economics, The University of Sheffield); Davide Sala (Department of Business and Economics, University of Southern Denmark)
    Abstract: Recent studies have concluded that R&D grants can induce firms to export and that exporting and innovating can be complementary activities at the firm level. Yet the trade literature has paid little attention to the scope of innovation policy as a stimulus to both trade and innovation. To investigate this question we rely on a general work-horse model of trade and firm heterogeneity with firm investments in R&D activities. The multiplicity of equilibria together with the interplay of innovation and trade policies uncover novel results. In particular, we show that the effects of either policy depend on the degree of protectionism in a country. Therefore, countries can respond differently to the same policy, and similarly to different policies. In such a context, different governments may face different degrees of freedom regarding how to achieve a given target. This finding leads us to discuss the issue of policy coordination.
    Keywords: innovation; innovation policy; heterogenous firms; technology adoption; trade policy
    JEL: F12 F13 F15 O32
    Date: 2013
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:shf:wpaper:2013017&r=ino
  5. By: Tavassoli, Sam (CSIR, Blekinge Inst of Technology)
    Abstract: This paper analyzes the role of innovation on the export behavior of firms. Using two waves of Swedish CIS data merged with register data on firm-specific characteristics. I estimate the influence of the innovation output of a firm on its export propensity and intensity, respectively. I find that the innovation output of firms (measured as sales due to innovative products) has a positive and significant effect on export behavior of firms. The results also show that it is indeed innovation output, rather than innovation input (innovative efforts), that matters for export behavior of firms. Specifically, innovation output leads to increase in later export propensity and intensity of firms. Moreover, there is also strong association of productivity and ownership structure of firms with export propensity and intensity of firms. The results are robust when unobserved time-invariant heterogeneity of firm and also potential endogeneity of innovation-export are taken into accounted.
    Keywords: Innovation output; innovation input; export propensity; export intensity
    JEL: F14 O31 O33
    Date: 2013–12–03
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hhs:bthcsi:2013-005&r=ino
  6. By: Rajah RASIAH (Faculty of Economics and Administration Building, University of Malaya)
    Abstract: Using a stylized framework of technological capability development through pursuing Keynesian-Kaleckian style demand management strategies, this paper discusses initiatives that poorer member governments should take to stimulate technological upgrading of firms at the bottom with a focus on innovation, as well as, discussed the governance framework of intellectual property rights (IPRs) in ASEAN. Typologies of taxonomies and trajectories were used to evolve a policy framework to coordinate the relationship between macroinstitutions, meso-organizations and micro-agents (firms) for ASEAN members upgrade to transform from developing nations to join Singapore as developed nations. Recognizing the varying capacities of ASEAN members, the paper recommends that a common platform of IPRs be developed with the more developed members assisting the LDC members to quicken the development of a technologically more egalitarian region.
    Keywords: Innovation, intellectual Property Rights, ASEAN, Institutions, R&D
    JEL: O31 O32 O38 O43
    Date: 2013–11
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:era:wpaper:dp-2013-28&r=ino
  7. By: Birgit Aschhoff; Georg Licht; Paula Schliessler
    Abstract: Europe’s innovation potential is currently dominated by well-established large companies. In most member countries the bulk of R&D expenditures is spend by large companies. Following OECD data, SME’s share in total R&D spending amount to 8% in Germany or Japan, around 15% in US, France, Korea or Italy, about 20% in Sweden, Finland or Switzerland, about 30% in Netherlands, Austria or Poland, and about 50% in Poland, Ireland, Slovakia or Greece. First of all, these figures point to a considerable heterogeneity with regard to the importance of SMEs in national R&D activities. However, young companies are said to be the driving force behind radical innovation which will be a source of employment and growth in future. In addition, the weakness of Europe is not only the small number of hightech startups but more specifically the number of hightech startups which accomplish continuing, rapid growth. However, there might be significant technology specific heterogeneity with regard to the contribution of SMEs and young firms to innovation. The central question of the paper is whether SMEs and young firms might be agents with a special contribution to new growth path in Europe. We took new renewable energy technologies as an example at test whether the contribution of SMEs and young firms is larger in this technology area compared to invention as measured by patenting. In order to focus on the most valuable patents we use patent applications at the European Patent Office which were also applied for patent production at the USPTO and the Japanese Patent Office (“triadic patent applications”). The analysis proceed in two steps: The paper looks first at trends in international patenting and compares triadic patent application in the field of energy with all triadic patent application by country of inventors. The idea is to highlight the role of EU and its member states in invention activity in a technology-field which is of special relevance for a new, sustainable growth path. In the second step we look at the contribution for SMEs and young firms to such a new growth path by a detail analyses of triadic patent application by German companies as the SMEs share to R&D is the smallest compared to all other EU member states as well as compared to OECD member states (except Japan). The focus on Germany is motivated for two reasons - to ease the analysis and to focus on the most extreme case of the firm-size R&D distribution which is observed in EU and OECD member states. The study employs the WIPO “Green Inventory” classification to identify energy-related patents via the international patent classification used by all patent offices to assign patents by technology and potential fields of application. This classification comprise as main technology classes alternative energy production, transportation, energy storage, waste management, agriculture/forestry, regulatory and design aspects, and nuclear power generation. The number of green inventory patents increased from 1991 to 2007 by a factor of 2.5 to 12.500 patent applications. The majority of this increase is observable in renewable energy product, storage of energy, design and management of energy systems, and waste management. Patents related to nuclear power account for 4% of green inventory patents and this share declined even more to 1% in 2007. Surprisingly, the increase of green inventory patent applications at the EPO more or less equals the increase in overall patent applications at the EPO. Hence, the share of green inventory patents in total patent application at EPO was constant and fluctuating always between 8-10% with not visible trend. Similarly, albeit the increase in the number of triadic patents is less impressive (only by a factor of 1.4) the structural features are the same. Overall, the importance of green patent activities does not greatly vary between countries or regions. In 2007, the share of green patent applications in all patent applications at the EPO lies between 7% and 12%. Interestingly, the new member states and southern Europe are at the upper end of the range (12% and 10%, respectively) - besides Japan (11%) and the US (10%). Green patents are slightly less important for Northern Europe and China (both 7%). Focusing on more valuable patent application (“triadic patent application”), green technologies become more important in Germany, Korea and China and lose importance in Southern Europe. The second step linked sustainable growth to the “entrepreneurial” economy by examining to which degree small and young firms are driving sustainable patenting. We find SMEs to be responsible for about 15% of all patent applications. This is the same for the WIPO Green Inventory classified “green” patents. Around half of patent applications of SMEs are made by young firms. About one half of all patent applications by SMEs are filed by micro firms. When narrowing down the analysis to triadic patents, we find the contribution of SMEs to decrease to about 9% of all patent applications which is probably caused by the larger costs of applying and maintaining triadic patents than EPO patents. The contribution to green patenting is even lower for triadic patents with only 6% of all green patents coming from SMEs. In the third step of the analysis, based on the link of German firm data to patent applications at the European Patent Office, we analyzed at the firm level whether small and young firms are more or less likely to file sustainable patents than other firms. The results show that large firms are significantly more likely to file both patents in general and green patents. We do find that, for micro, small and medium size firms, the negative effect on patenting compared to the reference category of a large firm is less strong for the younger firms. This effect exists both for the generation of patents in general and the generation of green patents. Therefore there does not seem to be a particular advantage for small or young firms in producing sustainable, green patents. Even more, SMEs and young firms seem to face larger obstacles to start inventing in green energy technologies than in other technology fields. In any case SMEs and young firms will probably not an important driver of new technologies like in some other fields of technology. Of course we have to admit that our same only covers international patent applications for the priority year 2007 or earlier. Hence, things might have changed in the meantime due to e.g. extended government support for innovation in green energy fields. However, this question can only be examined with future editions of the PATSTAT data which fully covers more recent years. In addition, we cannot rule out the SMEs and/or young firms are especially important for patents which are radical driver of technological change. To address this question several measurement issues need to be solved and/or existing measurement approaches need verification. However, this is beyond the limits of our study. What might be the contribution to the central questions of the wwwforEurope project? First of all, young and small firms might not able to drive the technology development towards a more sophisticated use of energy resources and renewable energies. Like in most other fields of technology the direction of technical change is determined by established large firms. Hence, under the current framework of innovation and industrial policies, the development of the “more entrepreneurial economy” will probably not form forerunners on the ways towards a new growth path. Secondly, private sector’s production of invention activities became not stronger directed towards technologies which aim at production, storage, distribution, and management of new energy technologies compared to other fields of technology. Given the societal need for new energy technologies the paper speaks in favor of government regulation, invention and incentives to stimulate research, development, and implementation new energy technologies. However, we do not find arguments that such stimuli should favor SMEs or young firms.
    Keywords: Green patents, sustainable patenting, SMEs, young firms
    JEL: O31 M13 C81
    Date: 2013–11
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:feu:wfewop:y:2013:m:11:d:0:i:47&r=ino
  8. By: Ioannis Bournakis; Sushanta Mallick; David Kernohan; Dimitris A.Tsouknidis
    Abstract: This paper examines the direct effects of corporate tax on firm productivity along with the interaction effects of tax policy and R&D activity on productivity at firm level for over 13,062 firms during 2004-2011. Our main findings are first, that there is evidence for productivity convergence and we find that there is a positive robust relationship between R&D and firm productivity, whereas tax policy has a negative distortionary effect on TFP. Second, firms with greater export orientation do not seem to achieve much improvement in productivity, whereas the favourable productivity effect in the case of R&D-based firms suggests that if there are tax incentives in place for R&D type activity, it can promote innovation and drive productivity convergence (lagging firms closing the technology gap with those at the frontier), particularly so when there is a continued decline in overall economic activity. The results also show a significant non-linear effect of tax rate on firm-level productivity, identifying an inverse U-shaped relationship
    Keywords: Total Factor Productivity, Catch-Up, Effective Tax Rate, Firm-level Productivity Convergence, UK.
    JEL: O3 O4
    Date: 2013–11
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cgs:wpaper:45&r=ino
  9. By: Viral V. Acharya; Zhaoxia Xu
    Abstract: This paper examines the relationship between innovation and firms' dependence on external capital by analyzing the innovation activities of privately-held and publicly-traded firms. We find that public firms in external finance dependent industries generate patents of higher quantity, quality, and novelty compared to their private counterparts, while public firms in internal finance dependent industries do not have a significantly better innovation profile than matched private firms. The results are robust to various empirical strategies that address selection bias. The findings suggest that public listing is beneficial to the innovation of firms in industries with a greater need for external capital.
    JEL: G31 G32 O16 O30
    Date: 2013–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:19708&r=ino
  10. By: Tereso S. TULLAO, Jr. (Angelo King Institute for Ecohomic Business Studies De La Salle University); Christopher James CABUAY (Angelo King Institute for Ecohomic Business Studies De La Salle University)
    Abstract: The role of education is crucial in process of economic development. Initially, investments in training and education produce the necessary technical workers. At higher levels of economic development, the formation of highly skilled technicians, engineers, and professionals are made through advanced levels of education. The accumulation of sophisticated types of human capital is a major factor in creating the research and innovation infrastructure of a mature economy. Looking at the research and development (R&D) capacity of the ASEAN region, we see that most countries still have ways to go in order to fully develop their innovative capacity. Engineering, which is a significant source of innovations in a country, needs to have its curriculum revamped to adapt to global competition as well as to cater to the need of countries to innovate. This study recommends the improvement of technical competence of engineering education, the exploration of possible cooperation among engineering schools and professionals, learning from advanced economies on the development of advanced skills, the development of the soft skills of engineering students, and adopting an innovation perspective in the development of a nation.
    Keywords: Education, human capital, research and development, innovation, engineering education.
    JEL: I23 I25 J24 O31 O32
    Date: 2013–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:era:wpaper:dp-2013-36&r=ino
  11. By: Tomohiro MACHIKITA (Institute of Developing Economies and Stanford University); Yasushi UEKI (Institute of Developing Economies)
    Abstract: This paper investigates the relationship between firm-level upgrading and buyer-seller business networks in order to better understand how and to whom technology transfer occurs. Using firm’s self-reported buyer and supplier network data from business–to–business (B2B) markets in Southeast Asia, this paper finds the following results: (1) Firms are more likely to achieve product and process innovation if they invest in inhouse R&D and transfer technology from their production partners; (2) product and process innovation varies considerably across different types of buyers and suppliers; (3) negative impacts of local suppliers suggest the importance of input quality for product and process innovation; and (4) large differences in product and process innovations among firms with similar buyers and suppliers can be explained by differences in embodied technology transfer even within narrowly defined production partners’ ownership. Data from technology transfer in buyer-seller business networks provide the basis for detecting the key drivers of industrial upgrading in the context of B2B markets in emerging economies.
    Keywords: embodied technology transfer; linked manufacturer–supplier analysis.
    JEL: O12 O14 O32 L14 F14
    Date: 2013–11
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:era:wpaper:dp-2013-26&r=ino
  12. By: Popescul, Daniela
    Abstract: The present paper proposes a new way of thinking regarding the relation between innovation and knowledge using a Physics-borrowed model, trying to prove whether knowledge resources can „flow” (be percolated) in a network or a grid, in order to be transformed in technological innovation. In the Knowledge Flow Percolation Model centre, human beings are seen as thinking electrons, both consuming and generating knowledge flow. Through the inter-dependent actions of individuals, knowledge circulates inside different types of organisations, allowing functioning and innovating in order to obtain competitive advantages. The model can be extended also at a national level, and some assumptions of self similarity appear in this process of extension. The model must be seen as a proposal for the research community and as a basis for future observations regarding the importance of knowledge flows in innovation.
    Keywords: technological innovation, knowledge, knowledge flows, knowledge flows percolation model
    JEL: D83 M12 O31 O32
    Date: 2012–06–09
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pra:mprapa:51746&r=ino
  13. By: Marit E. Klemetsen; Brita Bye; Arvid Raknerud (Statistics Norway)
    Abstract: This paper provides new evidence on the role of non-market based (“command-and-control”) regulations in relation to innovations in environmental technologies. While pricing is generally considered the first-best policy instrument, non-market regulations, such as technology standards and non-tradable emission quotas, are common when a regulator faces multiple emission types and targets, heterogeneous recipients, or uncertainty with regard to marginal damages. Knowing whether these regulations spur or hinder innovation is of great importance to environmental policy. Using a unique Norwegian panel data set that includes information about the type and number of patent applications, technology standards, non-tradable emission quotas, and a large number of control variables for almost all large and medium-sized Norwegian incorporated firms, we are able to conduct a comprehensive study of the effect of non-market based regulations on environmental patenting. Unlike previous studies that are typically conducted at the industry level, we are able to take firm heterogeneiry into account, and thereby reduce the common problem of omitted variable bias in our analysis. We empirically identify strong and significant effects on innovations from implicit regulatory costs associated with the threat that a firm will be sanctioned for violating an emission permit.
    Keywords: Command-and-control regulations; Technology standards; Non-tradable emission quotas; Patents; Innovation; Environmental technologies; Random effects ordered probit model.
    JEL: C23 O34 Q52 Q53 Q55 Q58
    Date: 2013–09
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ssb:dispap:754&r=ino
  14. By: Crescenzi, Riccardo (London School of Economics); Nathan, Max (London School of Economics); Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés (London School of Economics)
    Abstract: This paper investigates how physical, organisational, institutional, cognitive, social, and ethnic proximities between inventors shape their collaboration decisions. Using a new panel of UK inventors and a novel identification strategy, this paper systematically explores the net effects of all these 'proximities' on co-patenting. The regression analysis allows us to identify the full effects of each proximity, both on choice of collaborator and on the underlying decision to collaborate. The results show that physical proximity is an important influence on collaboration, but is mediated by organisational and ethnic factors. Over time, physical proximity increases in salience. For multiple inventors, geographic proximity is, however, much less important than organisational, social, and ethnic links. For inventors as a whole, proximities are fundamentally complementary, while for multiple inventors they are substitutes.
    Keywords: innovation, patents, proximities, cities, regions, knowledge spillovers, collaboration, ethnicity
    JEL: O31 O33 R11 R23
    Date: 2013–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:iza:izadps:dp7797&r=ino
  15. By: M. Bourreau; P. Dogan
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:qsh:wpaper:33652&r=ino
  16. By: Ramiro De Elejalde (Facultad de Economía y Negocios, Universidad Alberto Hurtado); David Giuliodori (Universidad Nacional de Córdoba); Rodolfo Stucchi (Inter-American Development Bank)
    Abstract: This paper provides evidence about the effect of innovation on employment in Argentina in the period 1998-2001. In particular we quantify the impact of process and product innovations on employment growth and the skill composition. Our result show that (i) Product innovations have a positive impact on employment growth biased towards skill labor (ii) Process innovations do not effect employment growth or composition. (iii) There are no heterogeneous effects in technology intensity and size. (iv) Most of the contraction in employment in this period was explained by non-innovations.
    Keywords: process innovation, Product innovation, Employment Growth, Argentina
    JEL: D2 J23 L1
    Date: 2013–09
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ila:ilades:inv291&r=ino
  17. By: M. Bourreau; P. Dogan; M. Manant
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:qsh:wpaper:33649&r=ino
  18. By: M. Bourreau; P. Dogan
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:qsh:wpaper:33645&r=ino
  19. By: Elizabeth J. Altman (Harvard Business School); Frank Nagle (Harvard Business School); Michael L. Tushman (Harvard Business School, Organizational Behavior Unit)
    Abstract: Innovation has traditionally taken place within an organization's boundaries and/or with selected partners. This Chandlerian approach to innovation has been rooted in transaction costs, organizational boundaries, and information processing challenges associated with distant search. Information processing, storage, and communication costs have long been an important constraint on innovation and a reason for innovative activities to take place inside the boundaries of an organization. However, exponential technological progress has led to a dramatic decrease in information constraints. In a range of contexts, information costs approach zero. In this chapter, we discuss how sharply reduced information costs enable organizations to engage with communities of developers, professionals, and users for core innovative activities, frequently through platform-based businesses and ecosystems and by incorporating user innovation. We then examine how this ease of external engagement impacts the organization and its strategic activities. Specifically, we consider how this shift in information processing costs affects organization boundaries, business models, interdependence, leadership, identity, search, and intellectual property. We suggest that much of the received wisdom in these areas of organization theory requires revisiting. We then discuss the implications for an organization's management of innovation and conclude with research opportunities.
    Keywords: Managing Innovation, Information Costs, Information Constraints, Communities, Organization Boundaries, Technological Progress, Platforms and Ecosystems, User Innovation
    Date: 2013–11
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hbs:wpaper:14-043&r=ino
  20. By: Muñoz, Félix (Departamento de Análisis Económico (Teoría e Historia Económica). Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.); Encinar, María Isabel (Departamento de Análisis Económico (Teoría e Historia Económica). Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.); Otamendi, Francisco Javier (Departmento de Economía Aplicada I, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid.)
    Abstract: The problem to allocate effort to innovation activities is defined and modelled for any single entrepreneur according to its propensity to innovate, which combines pure innovation and rent-seeking strategies. The allocation problem is solved both analytically and via simulation. The individual decisions measured in units of innovation are then aggregated to calculate the innovation quantity for a given population based on the distribution of heterogeneous entrepreneurs. The entrepreneurship rate and the implications for economic growth are also quantified. Consequently, policy makers should focus on reducing the entry barriers and the costs of production in order to stimulate the entrepreneurial activity and maximize the innovation quantity. They should also foster the attitude and propensity towards innovation.
    Keywords: entrepreneurial heterogeneity; propensity to innovate; endogenous growth
    JEL: M13 O12 O40
    Date: 2013–11
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:uam:wpaper:201306&r=ino
  21. By: Fleisher, Belton M. (Ohio State University); McGuire, William H. (University of Washington Tacoma); Smith, Adam Nicholas (Ohio State University); Zhou, Mi (Agricultural Bank of China)
    Abstract: Intangible knowledge capital (IKC) – technology produced by workers but not embodied in them – can offset the "middle income trap" as China exhausts the benefits of international technology transfer. IKC is productivity-enhancing among Chinese enterprises – more so in domestically owned than in foreign invested enterprises. Consistent with other research, we find that China's IKC generates patents in China, but fewer than in major industrialized economies. Among domestically owned enterprises, IKC growth has flowed more toward higher-tech, export-oriented industries, while among foreign invested enterprises, it has been oriented more toward domestic sales.
    Keywords: intellectual capital, technology, economic growth, intellectual property, Asia, China
    JEL: O31 O33 O34 O43 P33
    Date: 2013–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:iza:izadps:dp7798&r=ino
  22. By: Ritzen, Jo (IZA and Maastricht University); Zimmermann, Klaus F. (IZA and University of Bonn)
    Abstract: We sketch a visionary strategy for Europe in which full employment is quickly regained by 2020, where income inequality is reduced and the economies are more sustainable. We name this scenario "vibrant." It is contrasted with what would happen if present policies continue within the European Union (EU) and its member states. In the vibrant scenario, full employment is regained by more policy attention toward innovation and its underlying research and development (R&D), accompanied by more labor mobility within and between EU countries, in combination with a selective immigration policy based on labor market shortages. The road to full employment is embedded in a landscape with less income inequality and more "greening" of EU member states' economies. We translate the vibrant scenario into policy proposals distinguishing between the role for the EU and that of the member states. We hope these proposals will be included in the election programs for the upcoming 2014 European Parliament elections and in developing the mandate for the new European Commission in December 2014.
    Keywords: employment, labor mobility, innovation, income inequality, competition, labor markets, greening, happiness
    JEL: D31 D33 F55 I23 I24 I25 I28 J11 J18 J21 J31 J64 J83 O31 O38 O52
    Date: 2013–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:iza:izapps:pp73&r=ino
  23. By: Castaner, X.; Dussauge, P.; Garrette, B.; Mulotte, L. (Tilburg University)
    Date: 2013
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ner:tilbur:urn:nbn:nl:ui:12-5906129&r=ino

This nep-ino issue is ©2013 by Steffen Lippert. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.