nep-ias New Economics Papers
on Insurance Economics
Issue of 2012‒02‒01
five papers chosen by
Soumitra K Mallick
Indian Institute of Social Welfare and Business Management

  1. Is it all about Money? A Randomized Evaluation of the Impact of Insurance Literacy and Marketing Treatments on the Demand for Health Microinsurance in Senegal By Jacopo Bonan; Oliver Dagnelie; Philippe LeMay-Boucher; Michel Tenikue
  2. Risk-sharing or risk-taking? Counterparty risk, incentives and margins By Bruno Biais; Florian Heider; Marie Hoerova
  3. Selective Hiring and Welfare Analysis in Labor Market Models By Christian Merkl, Thijs van Rens
  4. Redistribution and insurance in the German welfare state By Bartels, Charlotte
  5. Competing risks analysis and deposit insurance governance convergence By Christopher, Gandrud

  1. By: Jacopo Bonan; Oliver Dagnelie; Philippe LeMay-Boucher; Michel Tenikue
    Abstract: In Senegal mutual health organizations (MHOs) have been present in the greater region of Thiès for years. Despite their benefits, in some areas there remain low take-up rates. We offer an insurance literacy module, communicating the benefits from health microinsurance and the functioning of MHOs, to a randomly selected sample of households in the city of Thiès. The effects of this training, and three cross-cutting marketing treatments, are evaluated using a randomized control trial. We find that the insurance literacy module has no impact, but that our marketing treatment has a significant effect on the take up decisions of households.
    Keywords: Community based health insurance scheme, Randomized control trials, Africa, Senegal
    JEL: C93 O17
    Date: 2012–01
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:mib:wpaper:216&r=ias
  2. By: Bruno Biais (Toulouse School of Economics (CNRS-CRM, IDEI), 21 Allée de Brienne, 31000 Toulouse, France.); Florian Heider (European Central Bank, Kaiserstrasse 29, D-60311 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.); Marie Hoerova (European Central Bank, Kaiserstrasse 29, D-60311 Frankfurt am Main, Germany.)
    Abstract: We analyze optimal hedging contracts and show that although hedging aims at sharing risk, it can lead to more risk-taking. News implying that a hedge is likely to be loss-making undermines the risk-prevention incentives of the protection seller. This incentive problem limits the capacity to share risks and generates endogenous counterparty risk. Optimal hedging can therefore lead to contagion from news about insured risks to the balance sheet of insurers. Such endogenous risk is more likely to materialize ex post when the ex ante probability of counterparty default is low. Variation margins emerge as an optimal mechanism to enhance risk-sharing capacity. Paradoxically, they can also induce more risk-taking. Initial margins address the market failure caused by unregulated trading of hedging contracts among protection sellers. JEL Classification: G21, G22, D82.
    Keywords: Insurance, moral hazard, counterparty risk, margin requirements, derivatives.
    Date: 2012–01
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ecb:ecbwps:20111413&r=ias
  3. By: Christian Merkl, Thijs van Rens
    Abstract: Firms select not only how many, but also which workers to hire. Yet, in standard search models of the labor market, all workers have the same probability of being hired. We argue that selective hiring crucially affects welfare analysis. Our model is isomorphic to a search model under random hiring but allows for selective hiring. With selective hiring, the positive predictions of the model change very little, but the welfare costs of unemployment are much larger because unemployment risk is distributed unequally across workers. As a result, optimal unemployment insurance may be higher and welfare is lower if hiring is selective
    Keywords: labor market models, welfare, optimal unemployment insurance
    JEL: E24 J65
    Date: 2012–01
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:kie:kieliw:1752&r=ias
  4. By: Bartels, Charlotte
    Abstract: Welfare states redistribute both between individuals (inter-individual redistribution) reducing annual, cross-sectional inequality and over the lifecycle of an individual (intra-individual redistribution) insuring individuals against income risks in the long-term. But studies measuring redistribution often focus on a one-year period and the second aspect is neglected. To quantify both inter- and intra-individual redistribution in Germany this study uses SOEP data from 1984 to 2009 to construct long-term incomes over a 20-year period. Results show that annual, cross-sectional inequality is higher than inequality in the long-run, but the effect of redistribution is also larger annually than in the long-term. Depending on age the distributional focus of the German welfare state differs. When persons are young, state intervention reduces income differences between individuals mainly through the progressive tax system. Getting older and reaching retirement age income-smoothing redistribution via social security pensions becomes central. --
    Keywords: long-term income inequality,income redistribution,social security
    JEL: D31 D63 H53 H55
    Date: 2011
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:zbw:fubsbe:201125&r=ias
  5. By: Christopher, Gandrud
    Abstract: Why do policies often seem to converge across countries at the same time? This question has been studied extensively in the diffusion literature. However, past research has not examined complex choice environments, especially where there are many alternatives. My paper aims to fill this gap in the literature. I show how Fine and Gray Competing Risks Event History Analysis can be used to tease apart the causes of policy convergence. I apply the method to an examination of the reasons why, from the mid-1990s to 2007, many countries created independent deposit insurers. I find an interaction between international recommendations and regional peers’ choices, particularly in the European Union. However, convergence appears to slow under the particular conditions of a banking crisis, regardless of how well independence was promoted. Possibly due to electoral incentives democracies seem to have been more likely to create independent insurers. Ultimately, I demonstrate how competing risks analysis can help enable future research on policy choices, complementing methods previously applied in political economy.
    Keywords: international policy diffusion; competing risks analysis; delegation; banking crisis; IMF; deposit insurance
    JEL: C41 F59 D80
    Date: 2011–07–15
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pra:mprapa:36087&r=ias

This nep-ias issue is ©2012 by Soumitra K Mallick. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.