nep-hrm New Economics Papers
on Human Capital and Human Resource Management
Issue of 2017‒04‒16
nine papers chosen by
Patrick Kampkötter
Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen

  1. Performance Pay and Applicant Screening By Jirjahn, Uwe; Mohrenweiser, Jens
  2. The Dispersion of Bonus Payments within and between Firms By Grund, Christian; Hofmann, Tanja
  3. What Drives Differences in Management? By Nicholas Bloom; Erik Brynjolfsson; Lucia Foster; Ron Jarmin; Megha Patnaik; Itay Saporta-Eksten
  4. Time To Go? Head Coach Quits and Dismissals in Professional Football By Buraimo, Babatunde; Bryson, Alex; Simmons, Rob
  5. The Selection and Causal Effects of Work Incentives on Labor Productivity: Evidence from a Two-Stage Randomized Controlled Trial in Malawi By Kim, Hyuncheol Bryant; Kim, Seonghoon; Kim, Thomas T.
  6. Is Distance Dead? Face-to-Face Communication and Productivity in Teams By Battiston, Diego; Blanes I Vidal, Jordi; Kirchmaier, Tom
  7. When and why people engage in different forms of proactive behavior: interactive effects of self-construals and work characteristics By Chia-Huei Wu; Sharon Parker; Long-Zeng Wu; Cynthia Lee
  8. Gender and Peer Effects in Social Networks By Julie Beugnot; Bernard Fortin; Guy Lacroix; Marie Villeval
  9. Whistle-Blower Protection: Theory and Experimental Evidence By Mechtenberg, Lydia; Muehlheusser, Gerd; Roider, Andreas

  1. By: Jirjahn, Uwe (University of Trier); Mohrenweiser, Jens (Bournemouth University)
    Abstract: Using German establishment data, we show that the relationship between intensity of performance pay and intensity of applicant screening depends on the nature of production. In establishments with increased multitasking, performance pay is positively associated with applicant screening. By contrast, in establishments without increased multitasking, performance pay is negatively associated with applicant screening. The findings fit the hypothesis that performance pay induces a positive self-sorting of employees if jobs are less multifaceted. In this case, employers with a high intensity of performance pay do not need intensive applicant screening to ensure a high quality of matches between workers and jobs. However, if jobs are more multifaceted, performance pay can entail problems of adverse self-sorting. In order to mitigate or overcome these problems, employers making intensive use of performance pay also screen applicants more intensively.
    Keywords: performance pay, multitasking, self-sorting, applicant screening, non-managerial employees, managerial employees
    JEL: J33 J60 M51 M52
    Date: 2017–03
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:iza:izadps:dp10643&r=hrm
  2. By: Grund, Christian (RWTH Aachen University); Hofmann, Tanja (RWTH Aachen University)
    Abstract: We explore the dispersion of bonus payments of managers within and between five large firms from the German chemical sector. We use data from a yearly salary survey in these firms during the observation period 2008 to 2013. Bonus payments account for 20 percent of base salaries on average. Both the amount and the dispersion of bonus-to-base ratios differ across firms. We disentangle the dispersion between and within the levels of firms' hierarchies. Revealed differences are consistent with differences in firms' value statements.
    Keywords: bonus payments, bonus to base rate, firm differences, pay policies, wage dispersion
    JEL: J31 J33 M52
    Date: 2017–03
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:iza:izadps:dp10642&r=hrm
  3. By: Nicholas Bloom; Erik Brynjolfsson; Lucia Foster; Ron Jarmin; Megha Patnaik; Itay Saporta-Eksten
    Abstract: Partnering with the Census we implement a new survey of “structured” management practices in 32,000 US manufacturing plants. We find an enormous dispersion of management practices across plants, with 40% of this variation across plants within the same firm. This management variation accounts for about a fifth of the spread of productivity, a similar fraction as that accounted for by R&D and twice as much as explained by IT. We find evidence for four “drivers” of management: competition, business environment, learning spillovers and human capital. Collectively, these drivers account for about a third of the dispersion of structured management practices. practices in 32,000 US manufacturing plants. We find an enormous dispersion of management practices across plants, with 40% of this variation across plants within the same firm. This management variation accounts for about a fifth of the spread of productivity, a similar fraction as that accounted for by R&D and twice as much as explained by IT. We find evidence for four “drivers” of management: competition, business environment, learning spillovers and human capital. Collectively, these drivers account for about a third of the dispersion of structured management practices.
    Keywords: Management, productivity, competition, learning
    JEL: L2 M2 O32 O33
    Date: 2017–01
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cen:wpaper:17-32&r=hrm
  4. By: Buraimo, Babatunde (University of Liverpool); Bryson, Alex (University College London); Simmons, Rob (Lancaster University)
    Abstract: That football Head Coaches will be dismissed for poor performance and will quit when they have better outside options seems to be nothing more than a statement of the obvious. But owners may find it hard to distinguish poor performance from bad luck and may find it difficult to identify and attract talented managers from other clubs. Indeed, most of the literature indicates little improvement in team performance when one coach replaces another. Equally, Head Coaches may have few options to move to better clubs even when they are performing well. We identify significant differences between determinants of quits and dismissals that are largely consistent with a standard model which predicts departures occur when the value of the job match specific surplus for one or both parties falls below the value of outside options. However, dismissals and quits are more common in Italy and Spain than in Germany and France, suggesting institutions may be important. We discuss the implications of our findings in the context of principal-agent theory and the wider literature on turnover among CEOs and other corporate leaders.
    Keywords: quits, dismissals, layoffs, managerial performance, team performance, football, survival analysis, competing risks
    JEL: J23 J24 J63 J64
    Date: 2017–03
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:iza:izadps:dp10600&r=hrm
  5. By: Kim, Hyuncheol Bryant (Cornell University); Kim, Seonghoon (Singapore Management University); Kim, Thomas T. (Yonsei University)
    Abstract: Incentives are essential to promote labor productivity. We implemented a two-stage field experiment to measure effects of career and wage incentives on productivity through self-selection and causal effect channels. First, workers were hired with either career or wage incentives. After employment, a random half of workers with career incentives received wage incentives and a random half of workers with wage incentives received career incentives. We find that career incentives attract higher-performing workers than wage incentives but do not increase productivity for existing workers. Instead, wage incentives increase productivity for existing workers. Observable characteristics are limited in explaining the selection effect.
    Keywords: career incentive, wage incentive, internship, self-selection, labor productivity
    JEL: J30 O15 M52
    Date: 2017–03
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:iza:izadps:dp10644&r=hrm
  6. By: Battiston, Diego; Blanes I Vidal, Jordi; Kirchmaier, Tom
    Abstract: Has technology made face-to-face communication redundant? We investigate using a natural experiment in an organisation where a worker must communicate complex electronic information to a colleague. Productivity is higher when the teammates are (exogenously) in the same room and, inside the room, when their desks are closer together. We establish face-to-face communication as the main mechanism, and rule out alternative channels such as higher effort by co-located workers. The effect is stronger for urgent and complex tasks, for homogeneous workers, and for high pressure conditions. We highlight the opportunity costs of face-to-face communication and their dependence on organisational slack.
    JEL: D23 M11
    Date: 2017–03
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:11924&r=hrm
  7. By: Chia-Huei Wu; Sharon Parker; Long-Zeng Wu; Cynthia Lee
    Abstract: When and why do people engage in different forms of proactive behavior at work? We propose that, as a result of a process of trait activation, employees with different types of self-construal engage in distinct forms of proactive behavior if they work in environments consistent with their self-construals. In an experimental Study 1 (N = 61), we examined the effect of self-construals on proactivity and found that people primed with interdependent self-construals engaged in more work unit-oriented proactive behavior when job interdependence also was manipulated. Priming independent self-construals did not enhance career-oriented proactive behavior, even when we manipulated job autonomy. In a field Study 2 (N = 205), we found that employees with interdependent self-construals working in jobs with high interdependence reported higher work unit commitment and higher work unit-oriented proactive behavior than employees in low interdependent jobs. Employees with independent self-construals working in jobs with high autonomy also exhibited stronger career commitment and more career-oriented proactive behavior than those in jobs with low autonomy. This research offers a theoretical framework to explain how dispositional and situational factors interactively shape people's engagement in different forms of proactive behavior.
    Keywords: Self-construal; Job design; Proactive behavior; Trait activation; Commitment
    JEL: R14 J01
    Date: 2017–03–30
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ehl:lserod:71991&r=hrm
  8. By: Julie Beugnot (CRESE - Centre de REcherches sur les Stratégies Economiques - UFC - UFC - Université de Franche-Comté); Bernard Fortin (CIRANO - Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en analyse des organisations - UQAM - Université du Québec à Montréal , CRREP - Centre de recherche sur les risques, les enjeux économiques, et les politiques publiques - Université Laval); Guy Lacroix (CIRANO - Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en analyse des organisations - UQAM - Université du Québec à Montréal , CRREP - Centre de recherche sur les risques, les enjeux économiques, et les politiques publiques - Université Laval); Marie Villeval (GATE Lyon Saint-Étienne - Groupe d'analyse et de théorie économique - ENS Lyon - École normale supérieure - Lyon - UL2 - Université Lumière - Lyon 2 - UCBL - Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 - UJM - Université Jean Monnet [Saint-Etienne] - Université de Lyon - CNRS - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)
    Abstract: We investigate whether peer effects at work differ by gender and whether the gender difference in peer effects-if any-depends on work organization, precisely the structure of social networks. We develop a social network model with gender heterogeneity that we test by means of a real-effort laboratory experiment. We compare sequential networks in which information on peers flows exclusively downward (from peers to the worker) and simultaneous networks where it disseminates bi-directionally along an undirected line (from peers to the worker and from the worker to peers). We identify strong gender differences in peer effects, as males' effort increases with peers' performance in both types of network, whereas females behave conditionally. While they are influenced by peers in sequential networks, females disregard their peers' performance when information flows in both directions. We reject that the difference between networks is driven by having one's performance observed by others or by the presence of peers in the same session in simultaneous networks. We interpret the gender difference in terms of perception of a higher competitiveness of the environment in simultaneous than in sequential networks because of the bi-directional flow of information.
    Keywords: Gender,peer effects,social networks,work effort,experiment
    Date: 2017
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:wpaper:halshs-01481450&r=hrm
  9. By: Mechtenberg, Lydia (University of Hamburg); Muehlheusser, Gerd (University of Hamburg); Roider, Andreas (University of Regensburg)
    Abstract: Whistle-blowing by employees plays a major role in uncovering corporate fraud. Various recent laws aim at improving protection of whistle-blowers and enhancing their willingness to report. Evidence on the effectiveness of such legislation is, however, scarce. Moreover, critics have raised worries about fraudulent claims by low-productivity employees. We study these issues in a theory-guided lab experiment. Easily attainable ("belief-based") protection indeed leads to more reports, both truthful and fraudulent. Fraudulent claims dilute prosecutors' incentives to investigate, and thereby hamper deterrence. These effects are ameliorated under more stringent ("fact-based") protection.
    Keywords: corporate fraud, corruption, whistle-blowing, business ethics, cheap-talk games, lab experiment
    JEL: C91 D83 D73 K42 M59
    Date: 2017–03
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:iza:izadps:dp10607&r=hrm

This nep-hrm issue is ©2017 by Patrick Kampkötter. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.