nep-hap New Economics Papers
on Economics of Happiness
Issue of 2024‒09‒16
two papers chosen by
Viviana Di Giovinazzo, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca


  1. Does Childbirth Change the Gender Gap in Well-Being between Partners? By Veronika Placha
  2. Let’s all get pessimistic about ill-being: civil society and political organisation mediations By DiMaria, charles-henri

  1. By: Veronika Placha (Institute of Economic Studies, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic)
    Abstract: This study examines gender disparities beyond pay gaps, focusing on the impact of childbirth on overall well-being. Traditional gender roles, especially in parenting, lead to unequal divisions of labor and affect both partners´ well-being, yet the shift in well-being after childbirth remains underexplored. Utilizing data from the 2013 and 2018 EU SILC surveys, the study investigates the well-being gap between mothers and fathers, revealing that childbirth significantly influences parents´ subjective well-being. Mothers tend to experience a longer-lasting positive effect, peaking during the newborn stage and gradually diminishing as children grow older, while fathers´ wellbeing boost is shorter-lived, typically fading after the child´s first year. The findings also indicate that the well-being gap between mothers and fathers has widened over time, especially during the preschool years, underscoring the complex dynamics of well-being among parents.
    Keywords: Subjective well-being, Gender disparities, Childbirth, Well-being gap
    JEL: J13 J16 I31 J12
    Date: 2024–08
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:fau:wpaper:wp2024_28
  2. By: DiMaria, charles-henri
    Abstract: Unemployment, job vulnerability, and inflation are among the economic events that generate stress and anxiety in the population. People express their anxiety by reporting ill-being. We evaluate the extent to which negative economic events translate into reported ill-being for the European countries between 2005 and 2019. Our objective is to identify countries that produce the lowest level of ill-being at a given level of negative economic events. We utilize a benchmarking technique called data envelopment analysis. While the standard version of this technique has been used to understand well-being, the standard version cannot explain ill-being. Therefore, we are the first to employ the non-standard version of this technique in the well-being literature known as anti-efficiency or pessimistic DEA. We find that Nordic countries tend to perform best in mitigating the influence of negative economic events on ill-being. Additionally, we discover that countries with well- organized public administration are better at containing ill-being.
    Keywords: Ill-being, pessimistic frontier, data envelopment analysis, civil society organizations, trust.
    JEL: H11 I31
    Date: 2024–07–30
    URL: https://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pra:mprapa:121603

This nep-hap issue is ©2024 by Viviana Di Giovinazzo. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.