New Economics Papers
on Economics of Happiness
Issue of 2013‒10‒11
five papers chosen by



  1. Does the Internet make people happier? By Thierry Pénard; Nicolas Poussing; Raphaël Suire
  2. Literature review on fundamental concepts and definitions, objectives and policy goals as well as instruments relevant for socio-ecological transition By Anna Dimitrova; Katarina Hollan; Daphne Laster; Andreas Reinstaller; Margit Schratzenstaller; Ewald Walterskirchen; Teresa Weiss
  3. Étude Comparative des solutions logicielles pour l'analyse territoriale des indicateurs de bien-être By Anthony Hombiat; Mahfoud Boudis; Marlène Villanova-Oliver; Jérôme Gensel; Benoit Le Rubrus
  4. Taking the Well-being of Future Generations Seriously : Do People Contribute More to Intra-temporal or Inter-temporal Public Goods? By Gilles Grolleau; Angela Sutan; Radu Vranceanu
  5. An empirical investigation into the determinants and persistence of happiness and life evaluation By Chrostek, Pawel

  1. By: Thierry Pénard (CREM - Centre de Recherche en Economie et Management - CNRS : UMR6211 - Université de Rennes 1 - Université de Caen Basse-Normandie); Nicolas Poussing (CEPS/INSTEAD - Centre d'Etudes de Populations, de Pauvreté et de Politiques Socio-Economiques / International Networks for Studies in Technology, Environment, Alternatives, Development - Centre d'Etudes de Populations, de Pauvreté et de Politiques Socio-Economiques / International Networks for Studies in Technology, Environment, Alternatives, Development); Raphaël Suire (CREM - Centre de Recherche en Economie et Management - CNRS : UMR6211 - Université de Rennes 1 - Université de Caen Basse-Normandie)
    Abstract: Given the increasingly prominent role the Internet plays in people's daily life, understanding its influence on individual well-being is crucial. Internet use yields direct utility and economic returns that may increase life satisfaction. But the Internet might also have detrimental effects (e.g. addiction, social isolation). This paper aims to examine the impact of Internet use on individual well-being. Using Luxemburgish data extracted from the European Value Survey, we find evidence that non users are less satisfied in their life than Internet users. Moreover, the positive influence of Internet use is stronger for individuals who are young or not satisfied with their income. These findings suggest that public policies aiming to reduce the digital divide by reaching out to non-Internet users are socially desirable.
    Keywords: Internet; Happiness; Life satisfaction; Digital divide; Social capital
    Date: 2013
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00864314&r=hap
  2. By: Anna Dimitrova; Katarina Hollan; Daphne Laster; Andreas Reinstaller; Margit Schratzenstaller; Ewald Walterskirchen; Teresa Weiss
    Abstract: The research project WWWforEurope undertakes to lie the theoretical and empirical foundations for the embarkment on a new socio-ecological growth path in Europe. The new path underlines the need to guarantee Welfare as a broad universal principle for its population, assuring economic and social prosperity. The new path stresses the value of achieving – what we call – Wealth, a value in which material and immaterial resources are combined with the goal to enrich people‘s lives and to preserve natural resources, nature and bio-diversity. Both cannot be achieved without Work: Europe needs to enable its population to achieve their life satisfaction at the highest level possible and Work is one of the most – if not, the most – fundamental precondition for this. In short, the overarching question the WWWforEurope project attempts to answer is what kind of new European growth and development strategy is necessary and feasible, enabling a socio-ecological transition to high levels of employment, well-being of its citizens, social inclusion, resilience of ecological systems and a significant contribution to the global common goods like climate stability. Thus the project’s central goals are to identify the forces and challenges necessitating deliberations on a new growth path, to define socio-ecological transition, key actors and main obstacles, and to find out how the process of a socio-ecological transition can be initiated, monitored, and accelerated on an institutional level (EU, national and regional level). A central prerequisite to successfully accomplish these central goals is to establish a common understanding of the central questions raised by this undertaking and to create awareness for the project’s systemic and interdisciplinary approach. To this behalf, this paper presents fundamental concepts, terms and definitions relevant for socio-ecological transition. Hereby the paper focuses on the concepts of sustainability, growth, innovation, welfare and well-being, wealth and work. We also look at the various dimensions and definitions of transition/transformation which can be found in the literature, trying to concretise the concept of a socio-ecological transition forming the context and starting point of the WWWforEurope project. The necessity to accomplish a socio-ecological transition represents the starting point and the background against which the concepts and terms addressed in this paper gain their relevance. Economic, environmental and social sustainability and sustainable growth and development, respectively, are the central and final aim of the envisaged socio-ecological transition. Sustainability is an indispensable precondition for societal and individual welfare/well-being. Socio-ecological transition to achieve sustainability requires putting into question the prevailing view on economic growth. While economic growth may help to reduce poverty or unemployment and may thus be positively related with social sustainability, this often implies negative external effects for the environment. Alternative growth concepts are to be explored therefore, which do not consider the economic dimension of sustainability only, but explicitly try to incorporate social and environmental aspects in addition. Several more sustainability-oriented growth concepts have been brought into the discussion more recently. All of them are departing from the empirical fact that with increasing levels of GDP per capita the relation between economic growth and societal as well as individual well-being is weakening and that economic growth on the contrary may even endanger environmental and social sustainability (e.g. due to too little time for family and friends) and thus negatively affect quality of life and well-being. A more sustainable perspective on growth requires a more sustainable view on innovation, as a central driver for growth. Within the context of a socio-ecological transition based on sustainable growth, ecological and social innovation gain in importance vis-à-vis purely profit-oriented innovation. Long-term growth is based on wealth as the productive base of an economy. Sustainable growth and development needs to rest on a comprehensive/inclusive wealth concept taking into account, besides the conventional material assets, also natural capital. Finally, socio-ecological transition will also affect the organisation of work/labour. This paper tries to define and concretise these fundamental concepts and terms. Thus it should provide some kind of lexicon, which serves as starting point and background for the work on the central questions guiding the WWWforEurope project. Wherever possible, the paper should facilitate the agreement on common definitions. It is not the aim of the paper to elaborate tradeoffs in depth and to offer solutions and answers already. It rather strives to motivate all research groups involved in the WWWforEurope project to use and discuss the existing concepts, may they be consistent or just offer a variety of thought. It also attempts at drawing attention to the existence of trade-offs and open questions relevant for the various research areas. Moreover, the paper wants to inspire the search for best (or the identification of not working) practices, and it wants to increase the awareness for existing barriers to change. While the paper is not able to elaborate in depth distributional and gender aspects as crucial cross-cutting issues, it aims at directing attention at them and at inspiring research undertaken in the WWWforEurope project to consider these cross-cutting issues. Finally, the paper does not focus too much on policy issues. It is the aim of the overall project to identify (potential) interlinkages, trade-offs and synergies and to discuss policy options and instruments in details to support a more dynamic, inclusive and ecological growth and development path for Europe.
    Keywords: Behavioural economics, beyond GDP, biophysical constraints, ecological innovation, economic growth path, gender, innovation, social innovation, socio-ecological transition, sustainable growth, synergies, wealth
    JEL: D6 E02 E61 H11 H51 H52 H53 H54 H55 I31 J11 J16 L16 O31 O43 O44 R11 Q20 Q40 Q50 Q51 Q58
    Date: 2013–09
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:feu:wfewop:y:2013:m:9:d:0:i:40&r=hap
  3. By: Anthony Hombiat (LIG - Laboratoire d'Informatique de Grenoble - Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble I - Institut polytechnique de Grenoble (Grenoble INP) - Université Pierre-Mendès-France - Grenoble II - CNRS : UMR5217); Mahfoud Boudis (LIG - Laboratoire d'Informatique de Grenoble - Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble I - Institut polytechnique de Grenoble (Grenoble INP) - Université Pierre-Mendès-France - Grenoble II - CNRS : UMR5217, CREG - Centre de recherche en économie de Grenoble - Université Pierre-Mendès-France - Grenoble II : EA4625); Marlène Villanova-Oliver (LIG - Laboratoire d'Informatique de Grenoble - Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble I - Institut polytechnique de Grenoble (Grenoble INP) - Université Pierre-Mendès-France - Grenoble II - CNRS : UMR5217); Jérôme Gensel (LIG - Laboratoire d'Informatique de Grenoble - Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble I - Institut polytechnique de Grenoble (Grenoble INP) - Université Pierre-Mendès-France - Grenoble II - CNRS : UMR5217); Benoit Le Rubrus (LIG - Laboratoire d'Informatique de Grenoble - Université Joseph Fourier - Grenoble I - Institut polytechnique de Grenoble (Grenoble INP) - Université Pierre-Mendès-France - Grenoble II - CNRS : UMR5217)
    Abstract: L'effervescence dans les sciences économiques et sociales autour de l'élaboration d'indicateurs complexes du bien-être, alternatifs aux indicateurs de richesse dits classiques tel que le Produit Intérieur Brut (PIB) par habitant, implique le développement parallèle d'outils pour la construction et la visualisation de ces nouveaux indicateurs. Dans ce document, nous effectuerons une analyse critique des principaux outils actuellement disponibles pour l'analyse d'indicateurs du bien-être.
    Keywords: analyse ; bien-être ; comparaison ; indicateur ; logiciel ; territoire
    Date: 2013
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-00869737&r=hap
  4. By: Gilles Grolleau (Unité MIAJ - INRA - Mathématiques et Informatique Appliquées - Institut national de la recherche agronomique (INRA)); Angela Sutan (ESC Dijon Bourgogne - ESC Dijon Bourgogne); Radu Vranceanu (Economics Department - ESSEC Business School)
    Abstract: We investigate the dynamics of cooperation in public good games when contributions to the public good are immediately redistributed across contributors (intra-temporal transfers) and when contributions to the public good by the current group are transferred over time to a future group (inter-temporal transfers). We show that people are more cooperative in inter-temporal contexts than in intra-temporal contexts. We also find that subjects invest more on average in public goods when they know in advance their inheritance from the past.
    Keywords: Public goods ; Voluntary contribution mechanism ; Inter-temporal vs intra-temporal transfers ; Sustainable development
    Date: 2013–09
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:journl:hal-00866970&r=hap
  5. By: Chrostek, Pawel
    Abstract: A comparison of measures of happiness and life evaluation indicates significant differences in correlates. Life evaluation is less dependent on external circumstances than happiness. Temporary changes in health, labour market status and income have a smaller impact on life evaluation than on happiness. Despite the differences both types of well-being exhibit a positive relation between current and past well-being. This result contradicts the hypothesis of general habituation.
    Keywords: hedonic adaptation, subjective well-being, determinants of happiness
    JEL: D0 I31
    Date: 2013–09–25
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:pra:mprapa:50442&r=hap

General information on the NEP project can be found at https://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.