nep-for New Economics Papers
on Forecasting
Issue of 2011‒09‒22
two papers chosen by
Rob J Hyndman
Monash University

  1. Improving GDP Measurement: A Forecast Combination Perspective By S. Boragan Aruoba; Francis X. Diebold; Jeremy Nalewaik; Frank Schorfheide; Dongho Song
  2. Forecasting economic growth in the euro area during the great moderation and the great recession By Marco J. Lombardi; Philipp Maier

  1. By: S. Boragan Aruoba; Francis X. Diebold; Jeremy Nalewaik; Frank Schorfheide; Dongho Song
    Abstract: Two often-divergent U.S. GDP estimates are available, a widely-used expenditure side version, GDPE, and a much less widely-used income-side version GDPI . We propose and explore a "forecast combination" approach to combining them. We then put the theory to work, producing a superior combined estimate of GDP growth for the U.S., GDPC. We compare GDPC to GDPE and GDPI , with particular attention to behavior over the business cycle. We discuss several variations and extensions.
    JEL: E01 E32
    Date: 2011–09
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:17421&r=for
  2. By: Marco J. Lombardi (European Central Bank, Kaiserstrasse 29, D-60311 Frankfurt, Germany.); Philipp Maier (Bank of Canada, International Department, 234 Wellington, Ottawa, ON, K1A 0G9, Canada.)
    Abstract: We evaluate forecasts for the euro area in data-rich and ‘data-lean’ environments by comparing three different approaches: a simple PMI model based on Purchasing Managers’ Indices (PMIs), a dynamic factor model with euro area data, and a dynamic factor model with data from the euro plus data from national economies (pseudo-real time data). We estimate backcasts, nowcasts and forecasts for GDP, components of GDP, and GDP of all individual euro area members, and examine forecasts for periods of low and high economic volatility (more specifically, we consider 2002-2007, which falls into the ‘Great Moderation’, and the ‘Great Recession’ 2008-2009). We find that all models consistently beat naive AR benchmarks, and overall, the dynamic factor model tends to outperform the PMI model (at times by a wide margin). However, accuracy of the dynamic factor model can be uneven (forecasts for some countries have large errors), with the PMI model dominating clearly for some countries or over some horizons. This is particularly pronounced over the Great Recession, where the dynamic factor model dominates the PMI model for backcasts, but has considerable difficulties beating the PMI model for nowcasts. This suggests that survey-based measures can have considerable advantages in responding to changes during very volatile periods, whereas factor models tend to be more sluggish to adjust. JEL Classification: C50, C53, E37, E47.
    Keywords: Forecasting, dynamic factor model, PMI model.
    Date: 2011–09
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ecb:ecbwps:20111379&r=for

This nep-for issue is ©2011 by Rob J Hyndman. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.