nep-evo New Economics Papers
on Evolutionary Economics
Issue of 2008‒12‒07
three papers chosen by
Matthew Baker
City University of New York

  1. On the Evolutionary Edge of Migration as an Assortative Mating Device By Stark, Oded; Behrens, Doris A.; Wang, Yong
  2. An Experimental Study of Conventions and Norms By Francesco Guala; Luigi Mittone
  3. Homo Reciprocans: Survey Evidence on Behavioural Outcomes By Dohmen Thomas; Falk Armin; Huffman David; Sunde Uwe

  1. By: Stark, Oded; Behrens, Doris A.; Wang, Yong
    Abstract: Replaced with revised version of paper 02/27/08.
    Keywords: Institutional and Behavioral Economics, Labor and Human Capital,
    Date: 2008
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ags:ubzefd:6316&r=evo
  2. By: Francesco Guala; Luigi Mittone
    Abstract: Although it is now recognized that norms play an important role in many economic decisions, compliance with conventions is generally considered to be driven by rational self-interest only. We report instead experimental data showing that (1) ‘external’ norms of fairness sustain social conventions that have emerged from repeated play of simple coordination games; and (2) with repetition such conventions acquire an ‘intrinsic’ normative power of their own. This creates pressure towards conformity, and patterns of regular behaviour that are far stronger and more stable than those that would be generated by mere self-interest and rationality.
    Date: 2008
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:trn:utwpce:0810&r=evo
  3. By: Dohmen Thomas; Falk Armin; Huffman David; Sunde Uwe (ROA rm)
    Abstract: This paper complements the experimental literature that has shown theimportance of reciprocity for behaviour in stylized labour markets or otherdecision settings. We use individual measures of reciprocal inclinations in alarge, representative survey, and relate reciprocity to real world labour marketbehaviour and life outcomes. We find that reciprocity matters, and we find thatthe way in which it matters is very much in line with the experimental evidence.In particular, positive reciprocity is associated with receiving higher wages andworking harder. Negatively reciprocal inclinations tend to reduce effort. Firmsdo not pay lower wages to individuals with strong negatively reciprocalinclinations. Instead, negative reciprocity increases the likelihood of beingunemployed. Looking at broader measures of success, in terms of number ofclose friends, and subjective well-being, we find that positively reciprocalinclination are associated with greater happiness and ability to sustain friendshiprelations, with the opposite being true for negative reciprocity.
    Keywords: education, training and the labour market;
    Date: 2008
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:dgr:umaror:2008007&r=evo

This nep-evo issue is ©2008 by Matthew Baker. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.