nep-cul New Economics Papers
on Cultural Economics
Issue of 2006‒11‒25
three papers chosen by
Roberto Zanola
Universita degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale

  1. The Analysis of Coordinated Effects in EU Merger Control: Where do we stand after Sony/BMG and Impala? By Oliver Budzinski; Gisela Aigner; Arndt Christiansen
  2. What Drives Media Slant? Evidence from U.S. Daily Newspapers By Matthew Gentzkow; Jesse M. Shapiro
  3. A Cost-Benefit Analysis of an Olympic Games By Darren McHugh

  1. By: Oliver Budzinski (Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Philipps Universitaet Marburg); Gisela Aigner; Arndt Christiansen (Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Philipps Universitaet Marburg)
    Abstract: The recent Impala Judgment by the CFI on the Sony/BMG Decision by the Commission represents the most important ruling on collective dominance since Airtours. We review both the Decision and the Judgment and derive implications for the institutional and substantive development of EU Merger Control. Firstly, Impala introduces an ambitious symmetric standard of proof for prohibition and clearance decisions by the Commission. While alleviating fears of an increasing number of false positives in the aftermath of Airtours, this entails the problem of how to deal with cases in which neither the existence, nor the absence of anticompetitive effects can be proven to the required standard. Secondly, the ongoing process of increasing the role of third parties in European Merger Control is fuelled. Thirdly, Impala has the potential to herald a comeback of coordinated effects analysis, further precising the conditions for establishing this kind of anticompetitive effect. Additionally, given the characteristics of the music industry, we criticise a lack of in-depth economic analysis of non-price competition issues, such as innovations and product diversity.
    Keywords: merger control, coordinated effects, standard of proof, music industry, collusion, Impala, Sony/BMG
    JEL: K21 L41 L13 L82
    Date: 2006
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:mar:volksw:200614&r=cul
  2. By: Matthew Gentzkow; Jesse M. Shapiro
    Abstract: We construct a new index of media slant that measures whether a news outlet's language is more similar to a congressional Republican or Democrat. We apply the measure to study the market forces that determine political content in the news. We estimate a model of newspaper demand that incorporates slant explicitly, estimate the slant that would be chosen if newspapers independently maximized their own profits, and compare these ideal points with firms' actual choices. Our analysis confirms an economically significant demand for news slanted toward one's own political ideology. Firms respond strongly to consumer preferences, which account for roughly 20 percent of the variation in measured slant in our sample. By contrast, the identity of a newspaper's owner explains far less of the variation in slant, and we find little evidence that media conglomerates homogenize news to minimize fixed costs in the production of content.
    JEL: D78 K23 L82
    Date: 2006–11
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:12707&r=cul
  3. By: Darren McHugh
    Abstract: This paper attempts to estimate the net benefit to Canada of the Vancouver 2010 Winter Olympic Games. Two particular classes of problems in Olympic CBA are studied in detail. The first is the unique nature of project dependency in an Olympic Games, and this is surmounted by the classification of Olympic-related costs and benefits as "Event-related" or "Infrastructure-related", with rules for handing each in the context of a CBA for an Olympic Games. The second is the estimation of net benefit of three types of "Olympic Outputs", namely the Olympic Spectacle, the Olympic Halo (the feelings of pride engendered in the residents of the host city), and the tourism induced by an Olympic Games. One key result of the paper is that a correct accounting of induced Olympic tourism shows that the net benefit of this tourism is substantially less than its widely touted 'economic impact'. Although a detailed estimation of infrastructure costs and benefits is outside the scope of the paper, their contribution to the net benefit of the Games under the proposed project accounting rules is clearly negative. The net benefit of the Olympic Games is therefore also substantially negative when the estimates of Olympic benefits from this paper are combined with published estimates for event costs.
    Keywords: Cost/Benefit Analysis, Olympics, Tourism
    JEL: D61
    Date: 2006–08
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:qed:wpaper:1097&r=cul

This nep-cul issue is ©2006 by Roberto Zanola. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.