nep-cfn New Economics Papers
on Corporate Finance
Issue of 2015‒01‒19
two papers chosen by
Zelia Serrasqueiro
Universidade da Beira Interior

  1. The Analytical Framework For Identifying And Benchmarking Systemically Important Financial Institutions In Europe By Renata Karkowska
  2. Option-Based Credit Spreads By Christopher L. Culp; Yoshio Nozawa; Pietro Veronesi

  1. By: Renata Karkowska (University of Warsaw, Faculty of Management)
    Abstract: The aim of this article is to identify systemically important banks on a European scale, in accordance with the criteria proposed by the supervisory authorities. In this study we discuss the analytical framework for identifying and benchmarking systemically important financial institutions. An attempt to define systemically important institutions is specified their characteristics under the existing and proposed regulations. In a selected group of the largest banks in Europe the following indicators ie.: leverage, liquidity, capital ratio, asset quality and profitability are analyzed as a source of systemic risk. These figures will be confronted with the average value obtained in the whole group of commercial banks in Europe. It should help finding the answer to the question, whether the size of the institution generates higher systemic risk? The survey will be conducted on the basis of the financial statements of commercial banks in 2007 and 2010 with the available statistical tools, which should reveal the variability of risk indicators over time. We find that the largest European banks were characterized by relative safety and without excessive risk in their activities. Therefore, a fundamental feature of increased regulatory limiting systemic risk should understand the nature and sources of instability, and mobilizing financial institutions (large and small) to change their risk profile and business models in a way that reduces the instability of the financial system globally.Length: 32 pages
    Keywords: banking, Systematically Important Financial Institutions, SIFI, systemic risk, liquidity, leverage, profitability
    JEL: C1 F36 G21 G32 G33
    Date: 2014–09
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:sgm:fmuwwp:42014&r=cfn
  2. By: Christopher L. Culp; Yoshio Nozawa; Pietro Veronesi
    Abstract: Theoretically, corporate debt is economically equivalent to safe debt minus a put option on the firm’s assets. We empirically show that indeed portfolios of long Treasuries and short traded put options (“pseudo bonds”) closely match the properties of traded corporate bonds. Pseudo bonds display a credit spread puzzle that is stronger at short horizons, unexplained by standard risk factors and unlikely to be solely due to illiquidity. Our option-based approach also offers a novel, model-free benchmark for credit risk analysis, which we use to run empirical experiments on credit spread biases, the impact of asset uncertainty, and bank-related rollover risk.
    JEL: G0 G12 G13 G21 G24 G3
    Date: 2014–12
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:nbr:nberwo:20776&r=cfn

This nep-cfn issue is ©2015 by Zelia Serrasqueiro. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.