nep-cbe New Economics Papers
on Cognitive and Behavioural Economics
Issue of 2014‒12‒13
five papers chosen by
Marco Novarese
Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro”

  1. Individual Characteristics and Behavior in Repeated Games: An Experimental Study By Douglas Davis; Asen Ivanov; Oleg Korenok
  2. What drives failure to maximize payoffs in the lab? A test of the inequality aversion hypothesis By Nicolas Jacquemet; Adam Zylbersztejn
  3. Self-serving bias and tax morale By Blaufus, Kay; Braune, Matthias; Hundsdoerfer, Jochen; Jacob, Martin
  4. Consistent or balanced? On the dynamics of voluntary contributions By Gallier, Carlo; Reif, Christiane; Römer, Daniel
  5. Housework Share between Partners: Experimental Evidence on Gender Identity By Auspurg, Katrin; Iacovou, Maria; Nicoletti, Cheti

  1. By: Douglas Davis (Virginia Commonwealth University); Asen Ivanov (Queen Mary University of London); Oleg Korenok (Virginia Commonwealth University)
    Abstract: Using a laboratory experiment, we investigate whether a variety of behaviors in repeated games are related to an array of individual characteristics that are popular in economics: risk attitude, time preference, trust, trustworthiness, altruism, strategic skills in one-shot matrix games, compliance with first-order stochastic dominance, ability to plan ahead, and gender. We do find some systematic relationships. A subject's patience, gender, altruism, and compliance with first-order stochastic dominance have some limited systematic effects on her behavior in repeated games. At the level of a pair of subjects who are playing a repeated game, each subject's patience, gender, and ability to choose an available dominant strategy in a one-shot matrix game systematically affect the frequency of the cooperate-cooperate outcome. However, overall, the number of systematic relationships is surprisingly small.
    Keywords: Experiment, Repeated game, Individual characteristics
    JEL: C91 C92 D03 D70
    Date: 2014–10
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:qmw:qmwecw:wp728&r=cbe
  2. By: Nicolas Jacquemet (EEP-PSE - Ecole d'Économie de Paris - Paris School of Economics - Ecole d'Économie de Paris, BETA - Bureau d'économie théorique et appliquée - CNRS : UMR7522 - Université de Strasbourg - Université Nancy II); Adam Zylbersztejn (EEP-PSE - Ecole d'Économie de Paris - Paris School of Economics - Ecole d'Économie de Paris, CES - Centre d'économie de la Sorbonne - CNRS : UMR8174 - Université Paris I - Panthéon-Sorbonne)
    Abstract: Experiments based on the Beard and Beil (1994) two-player coordination game robustly show that coordination failures arise as a result of two puzzling behaviors: (i) subjects are not willing to rely on others' self-interested maximization, and (ii) self-interested maximization is not ubiquitous. Such behavior is often considered to challenge the relevance of subgame perfectness as an equilibrium selection criterion, since weakly dominated strategies are actually used. We report on new experiments investigating whether inequality in payoffs between players, maintained in most lab implementations of this game, drives such behavior. Our data clearly show that the failure to maximize personal payoffs, as well as the fear that others might act this way, do not stem from inequality aversion. This result is robust to varying the saliency of decisions, repetition-based learning and cultural differences between France and Poland.
    Keywords: Coordination Failure ; Subgame perfectness ; Non-credible threats; Laboratory experiments; Social Preferences; Inequality Aversion
    Date: 2014
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:hal:journl:halshs-01026080&r=cbe
  3. By: Blaufus, Kay; Braune, Matthias; Hundsdoerfer, Jochen; Jacob, Martin
    Abstract: In a real-effort laboratory experiment to manipulate evasion opportunities, we study whether the moral evaluation of tax evasion is subject to a self-serving bias. We find that tax morale is egoistically biased: Subjects with the opportunity to evade taxes judge tax evasion as less unethical as opposed to those who cannot evade. The detection probability does not affect this result. Further, we do not find moral spillover effects, for example, on legal activities.
    Keywords: Evasion,Tax Morale,Tax Compliance,Self-Serving Bias,Moral Spillover
    JEL: H20 H26
    Date: 2014
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:zbw:arqudp:174&r=cbe
  4. By: Gallier, Carlo; Reif, Christiane; Römer, Daniel
    Abstract: We investigate the dynamic effects of a charitable lottery and an income tax on donations. The analysis is based on a two-round dictator game with the subject's charity of choice as recipient and additional incentives in the first round only. The immediate effect of a charitable lottery leads to higher contributions and we cannot find substantial crowding out of voluntary contributions in the presence of an income tax. These economic interventions weakly spill-over to the subsequent donation decisions without additional incentives. Our results suggest the presence of consistency seeking behaviour. This is especially true for a subgroup of participants with a rule-based mind-set and our research shows the importance of the subjects' moral framework in the context of dynamic pro-social behaviour.
    Keywords: charitable giving,laboratory experiment,lottery,tax,voluntary contribution mechanism
    JEL: C91 D64
    Date: 2014
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:zbw:zewdip:14060&r=cbe
  5. By: Auspurg, Katrin (Goethe University Frankfurt); Iacovou, Maria (University of Cambridge); Nicoletti, Cheti (University of York)
    Abstract: Using an experimental design, we investigate the reasons behind the gendered division of housework within couples. In particular, we assess whether the fact that women do more housework may be explained by differences in preferences deriving from differences in gender identity between men and women. We find little evidence of any systematic gender differences in the preference for housework, suggesting that the reasons for the gendered division of housework lie elsewhere.
    Keywords: gender, housework, unpaid work, division of labor, experiment
    JEL: J16 J22 C35
    Date: 2014–10
    URL: http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:iza:izadps:dp8569&r=cbe

This nep-cbe issue is ©2014 by Marco Novarese. It is provided as is without any express or implied warranty. It may be freely redistributed in whole or in part for any purpose. If distributed in part, please include this notice.
General information on the NEP project can be found at http://nep.repec.org. For comments please write to the director of NEP, Marco Novarese at <director@nep.repec.org>. Put “NEP” in the subject, otherwise your mail may be rejected.
NEP’s infrastructure is sponsored by the School of Economics and Finance of Massey University in New Zealand.